Home * About CAC * Chapters * Officers * Newsletter Competition * SCM Cancels * Awards * Articles * Free Web Pages * APS Home
This non-copyrighted article may be reproduced in any philatelic publication as long as the author's name, original source publication and the CAC's on-line web address is listed.
This article is a compilation of questions from the Internet stamp group rec.collecting.stamps
(r.c.s.) relating to stamp prices. More than a dozen sources were used for this
summary, which was strongly influenced by my own experiences and knowledge limits.
Much of the information given in the r.c.s. answers was based on personal experience,
making great anecdotes but little statistically sound analysis. The topic of
stamp-market pricing mechanisms might serve as a viable master's degree thesis
for an economics major.
(The newsgroup r.c.s. later split into two groups, rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
for philatelic discussions and rec.collecting.stamps.marketplace for buy and
sell postings.)
This document remains a work-in-progress. My summary is below, but the gist
of it is that "people really pay" varying amounts for the same material, depending
on what stamp "market" they use to get material. What started this project
off was this question:
"I was looking through my latest Scott catalogue and
comparing book value with stamps being traded in an Internet auction. Most
stamps were offered at prices well below book value. Judging from the pictures
and the few I bought, they seemed to be of decent quality. How can this be?
Why would anyone sell for so much less?"
I. THE MARKET
A. Market segments All of these markets need both a willing seller and a willing buyer. If the
buyer is a dealer, he expects to resell at a profit. If the buyer is a collector,
a selling collector may get a higher price but probably will have to sell the
collection item by item.
New buyers come from the outposts in department stores, from advertisers
in daily papers and on television, and from post offices. Without the entry-level
expensive marketplace, the market from which collectors like to buy cheaply
would gradually cease to exist, because it does not reproduce its customer
base from within.
The biggest stamp retailer, Mystic Stamp Company, marks up to about double
Scott, because its advertising in mass circulation publications cannot be sustained
by intra-hobby prices. Yet Mystic brings more new members to APS than any other
recruiter, and sometimes more than all the others combined. Many of those customers,
once familiar with the hobby's own marketplace, probably switch to less expensive
suppliers. Even, so Mystic does well enough to support a weekly full-color,
full-page spread on the back of Linn's Stamp News, and other full-page spreads
inside.
Meanwhile, all other segments face competition from below-market sellers
in Linn's classified ads, APS sales circuits, and on-line auctions, usually
of retired collectors who are disposing of their personal collections. Each
discrete segment has its own value system, which only indirectly affects the
others. The value systems can only "only indirectly affect the others" if the
buyer, seller, or both are unaware of them, unable to access them, or are uninterested
in them for a particular transaction. See my comment on "instant gratification" below.
1. Retail shops That's why high overhead shops such as Gimbels/Minkus/Robinsons, et al. bit
the dust. They had a good run until auctions, shows, small shops, and mail
order became well organized and easily accessible. The key point here is that
the alternatives had to get organized and be easily accessible. Big-city downtown
stamp shops are still a fixture of the marketplace in the cities such as Chicago,
Frankfurt, Hamburg, London, etc., despite their high retail prices.
2. Mail sales 3. Auctions A particular lot or collection in an auction may only be exposed to a limit
number of buyers at that moment. If there is a lack of interest at that moment,
or the buyers are not the right bidders for that kind of material, the lot
can be sold at substantial discount to catalog. Dealers have to buy the stamps
cheaply enough to make a profit on them.
This means dealers often make offers for stamps and collections that might
seem like an insult to the average person. Selling at auction gives the collector
an opportunity to. eliminate much of the overhead. He can get a better price
for selling AND a better price for the buyer of the stamp, too, than they might
otherwise get.
Most auctioneers say that the majority of their lots are sold to dealers
for resale to customers at a profit. This point became contentious when Scott
switched to retail valuations. At first, Scott relied on auction realizations
to calculate those values. Dealers howled, claiming that such were actually
wholesale prices, from which they marked up substantially.
The previous collector's comments on the pricing mechanisms within the US
market are interesting and useful, but not entirely paralleled in Europe. This
is particularly true in regard to the destination of most auction lots. It
may well be true in relation to collections and/or other "mixed" lots, but
then these are of no use in indicating market prices of individual stamps.
Internet auctions became very popular after this article was first written.
They seem to be provide buyers with a range of material broad in price and
quality. The exposure to a world-wide audience tends to help good material
to draw reasonable bids, albeit usually well below full Scott values, except
for items having some special feature not recorded by Scott.
A. Live B. APS Circuits C. Mail/Internet 4. Bourses This is an inexpensive way to convert duplicates or unwanted material into
wanted material. Trading range has been expanded by Internet listings of others
interested in trading. E-mail makes for quick correspondence and decisions.
B. Sellers Often these show stoppers are actually part of the dealer's personal collection
and he or she actually doesn't want to sell the items. They are just there
to impress customers with the depth of the inventory.
C. Buyers 1. Psychology II. CATALOG PRICES
Scott catalog values are not literal "retail values." They should be used
as an approximate indicator of relative value between different items. The
catalog only serves to place an item in relative magnitude of worth. The dealer
uses the catalog as a reference to help him/her make sure he doesn't pay too
much for an item and also sells it for its maximum benefit.
The last part doesn't necessarily mean top dollar. The catalog value is a
guide, not an absolute. It is the price a buyer will pay an informed seller
when the buyer must have the particular stamp immediately. Three things determine
stamp value (covers, etc, too): rarity, condition and popularity/desirability/fame.
It doesn't pay to put too fine a point on the question of price when the
asking price is a few dollars. Save haggling for buying a White Plains souvenir
sheet or other large item. Dealers will be happier to see you coming and will
respect your knowledge and sense of worth much more.
Prices can legitimately vary from one dealer to another. It depends on what
the dealer paid for a stamp, how quickly he wants to sell it, what his overhead
costs are, whether he or she specializes in that area and therefore puts more
effort into organizing his stock and looking for unusual items, etc. In fact,
most of the widely used general and specialized catalogs are not retail price
lists either, and usually overstate the actual values.
The only exceptions are actual dealers' price lists, such as H. E. Harris
and Brookman, and even these prices tend to be somewhat higher than those you
can find by shopping carefully, because those companies have high overhead
costs (for producing their catalogs, for one thing!). If half Scott is about
right for easy sales through low-overhead sales circuits, then full Scott is
about right for high overhead storefront stamp shops in big cities, and somewhere
in between is about right for bourse purchases. Note that companies that advertise
heavily in the mass media have to sell at about double Scott to make money.
A. Condition What has really been an eye-opener is comparing people's written descriptions
to the scans of the stamps. An incredibly high proportion of the stamps described
as VF or even VF+ are mis-centered or have perfs missing. One collector reports
having seen several US stamps with what he would consider to be major defects
described as VF and sell for above 30% of catalog. These are stamps he'd describe
as space fillers and expect to buy for 5% or less.
Another collector comments that he is beginning to think that this whole
condition "thing" is simply not important to a large number of collectors.
They seem to want to fill the spaces in their albums, and are happy with a "good-enough" copy.
It boils down to condition and true scarcity. If you want it, and are willing
to pay the price, then it's worth it. As to dealers putting stamps into APS
sales circuits at 50% of Scott's, a collector remarks that they aren't at the
same grade that Scott values, which is VF, with no faults.
Key comment from one collector: I don't care about the condition of the stamp
if it's "good enough" for me; I don't care about the dealers label. I don't
want damage, I don't want to see repairs. Early issues weren't always centered
properly, and I'm not going to go nuts searching for the perfect copy."
B. Changes since the mid-1980s Most auctioneers say that the majority of their lots are sold to dealers,
for resale to customers at a profit. This point became contentious when Scott
switched to retail valuations, because at first Scott relied on auction realizations
to calculate those values. Dealers howled that those were their wholesale prices,
from which they marked up substantially.
Recently, Scott's has been revaluing stamps by increasing the standard to
which individual stamps are held. Sets which recently catalogued for a given
price, may still catalog at the same price, but the price may now be for mint-never-hinged,
not mint-hinged as it was before. Scott's set a centering standard of F-VF
(and, for 1997 of VF) without raising prices much. I don't think Scott's aim
was to "devalue" collections, but to make its published prices more correct.
Since Scott's can't keep dropping prices forever to match discounts, an alternative
is to "raise the bar higher" for a stamp to qualify for the price. If a specific
copy of a stamp doesn't match the "raised standard" its value declines and
justifies a discount. That approach gives Scott's a chance to have its prices
correct and even makes real-world sense.
C. Timeliness D. Discounts In response to a question on a vaguely related topic, a seller recently commented
that he used 70% of Scott's as a real-world value for German-area stamps.
If a collection were composed of stamps with significant catalog value, then
the price paid would be a function of condition (centering, gum, absence of
defects and repairs, etc.) as well as comparative demand. The price could vary
from more than catalog, if the stamps were marvelous, to 10-20% of catalog
if there were lots of problems with the stamps or the country was not one the
dealer would expect to be able to resell in a reasonable amount of time.
III. MY CONCLUSIONS
For purposes of discussion, "stamp market" is any mechanism used to legally
transfer ownership. The market includes retail shops, mail sales, auctions-including
circuit books, bourses, and trading. These segments have fairly little overlap
except for the ever-present arbitrageurs known to Pat Herst's readers as satcheleers.
The amount of turnover done in any big city, high overhead retail shops has
to be a minuscule portion of the world's stamp turnover. Vastly more turnover
is gained in auctions, circuits, net sales, trades, shows, etc., than in
stores in cities. The value of a stamp can't be set on the value plus costs
of doing business, as value in purest terms is the highest amount someone
is willing to pay at any given point in time. Scarcity plus demand drives
prices, not a combination of scarcity, willingness to pay, and the other
guy's excess overhead.
These still serve the market for those with limited access to the other sources
of stamps (trading, retail sales, auctions) or for those seeking special
material.
In an auction, there IS always a seller, but no GUARANTEE of buyers. As a result,
an item of little interest may go at a very low price. An item with strong
interest may go far above auctioneer estimates or even catalog prices. This
is just a matter of economics and a function of supply and demand. Since
the stamp market is very fragmented and inefficient with regards to pricing,
price fluctuations can be tremendous.
Buyers have a chance to examine the material in detail, but the auction exists
at one moment in time. Unlike a retail shop or mail order house, the buyer
probably has no chance to try for the same lot tomorrow or next week.
Collectors always should sell below retail, because they do not have dealer
overhead costs, yet other collectors will readily pay more than dealer buy
prices. Despite that rather obvious point, collectors often don't "get it." Looking
at circuit books submitted to the APS Sales Division, most dealers price
their material to sell at about half Scott, and it tends to move quickly,
so they get their checks after just a few months. I have grouped APS circuits
under "Auctions" because any one circuit book gives a one-time chance at
a particular stamp.
There is a web site, http://www.stampfinder.com, that lists thousands of stamps
for sale. The listing gives both centering and catalog price, as well as
the sale value. Because the deal must be finalized with the owning dealer,
whose name and address I think one gets, there may be room for negotiation.
But it could be fairly close to a real open market and should drive catalog
prices to the same values. The Internet is helping collectors to learn about
the real stamp market.
These are a convenient way to examine material up-close-and-personal, and with
a range of dealers available. The buyer has a chance at instant gratification.
If the buyer is a dealer, he expects to resell at a profit. If dealers don't
stay in business, the collector loses access to supplies and has access to
stamps only through trading and new issues. Thus, the collector has an interest
in having dealers make enough profit to stay in business. Dealers have to
move inventory to do that. A dealer may also have a few show stoppers on
display that are priced at full CV.
If a buyer is a collector, a selling collector may get a higher price but will
probably have to sell the collection item by item. A collector who has. a
wide range of interests in reality plays dealers off against one another.
A buyer with $20 to spend on stamps from any one of half a dozen readily
available countries can get more catalog value for the $20 than a collector
with a very narrow interest--especially if there are other potential purchasers
competing to buy the same material.] I've noticed that virtually all of the
buyers of auction lots I've sold have lived in tiny towns-presumably people
with no other easy access to a steady supply of stamps. Because the market
is the way it is, one collector has gone to the "shotgun" approach to collecting.
He buys lots of wholesale lots, and resells just enough to recover his costs
and collect the parts he wants. His goal is to have $0 invested in his collection.
My feeling is that collectors want to feel they got a "deal." The easiest way
to feel they get a deal is to get a discount off the catalog price. Many collectors
also want instant gratification. The Internet doesn't give that, but retail
shops, bourses, and live auctions do.
Book value is an interesting concept. Scott claims that it is the average retail
price for a stamp in VF condition. However, it's customary to get stamps
for less than catalog, especially if you are willing to accept F-VF condition.
(Note most of the dealer ads offering good discounts from Scott specify F-VF.)
Also, when buying collections, it's expected to get the stamps at a discount.
In 1989(?), Scott's dropped prices a whole lot to reflect discounting (buying
at or near 50% of Scott's). All that happened was that the discount dropped
(to 30%?) off the much lower prices. Scott's couldn't keep dropping prices
to keep up with discounting without eventually reaching zero!
There is also a lack of timeliness of the catalog values. It takes time to
compile the market data and print the catalog, some values may be outdated.
A good example is Hong Kong, whose popularity is skyrocketing, where catalog
values are useless even day to day.
Good US material is fairly predictably going for about 30% of Scott, with cheaper
items bringing a higher percentage and more expensive ones bringing a lower
percentage. Why are the more expensive items going at a lower percentage
of catalog? One guess is that the average collector with $200 to spend would
rather fill in 20 "easy" gaps in the collections at $10 each than one really
difficult gap for $200.
If I'm paying more than 10%, it's for the hobby, not for financial benefit.
Personally, I view Scott's prices as reflecting the price agreed upon by
a knowledgeable buyer and seller when: